AMR Sept Banner v2

ASM Attends UN General Assembly

ASM President, Susan Sharp, Ph.D., joined global leaders at the United Nations General Assembly in New York today in a historical meeting to focus on the commitment to fight AMR.
Read

UN General Assembly Focuses on AMR

Leaders at the UN General Assembly draft a plan for coordinated, cross-cutting efforts to improve the current state of AMR.
Read

Superbugs are a 'Fundamental Threat'

If antibiotics were telephones, we would still be calling each other using clunky rotary dials and copper lines," Stefano Bertuzzi, CEO of ASM, told NBC News.
Read
Become a member today!
JOIN ASM
Submit Abstracts for Biothreats 2017
SUBMIT
Antibacterial Development Conference
REGISTER

August 20, 1996 - EPA Plant Pesticide Proposal

Program Resources Section
Public Response and Program Resources Branch
Field Operations Division (7506C)
Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460

RE: Docket Control Number OPP-300370A

The American Society for Microbiology (ASM) appreciates the opportunity to respond to Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) request for comment on additional information it is considering regarding the treatment, as inert ingredients, of "substances introduced into the plant along with the active ingredient to confirm or ensure the presence of the active ingredient."

The ASM takes the position that selectable markers in plants, which are not part of an active ingredient, do not fit the definition of inert ingredients as used in Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) or within the EPA proposed rule on plant-pesticides issued 23 November 1994. The markers are not components of a pesticide; if they were, they would be so considered. If EPA determines that the inert ingredients include selectable markers for purposes of the plant-pesticide proposed rule, then it must use the same rationale in proposing regulatory oversight for all transgenic plants using selectable markers, irrespective of the introduced trait. We do not believe it would be a sound scientific decision to regulate selectable markers unless there is scientific evidence that they present an unreasonable risk to the plants, humans, other consumers or users of the plants, or the environment. At present, we are not aware of such evidence. Furthermore, this is not in concurrence with other federal agencies that deal with transgenic plants, especially the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Please be reminded that the ASM is one of the participating and signatory societies to the report 'Appropriate Oversight for Plants with Inherited Traits for Resistance to Pests', a scientific critique that makes clear the limitations of the EPA's proposed rule on plant-pesticides.

TPL_asm2013_SEARCH

2263